![]() Goal-line technology requires seven cameras just to monitor the small area within the goal, so being able to monitor all the outer areas of the pitch, especially when the ball could go out of play at any height, isn't realistic. This can be useful with cameras which look along the goal-line, but there is no camera which looks up the touchline. While the attacking phase was deciding factor for the VAR in this case, he only has the host broadcast cameras to make a decision on the ball being out of play. I think I would go for because normally the VAR cannot check on the sideline, only on the goal line." Wenger also added: "Or they did not have the potential to check if the ball was out or not. No one can be truly certain the ball went out of play, yet the TV graphic was presented as fact while the assistant was very close with a clear view. The image was from a graphical model created by television broadcaster beINSPORTS, shown on its Champions League coverage. It isn't approved for use or available to the VAR, and there is no specific technology to check the ball going out of play on the sideline. They're small details, but the referee wasn't attentive." ![]() It's not me saying it the technology does," Ancelotti said in his postmatch news conference. ![]() It's very clear evidence the APP has been reset and the VAR should not review prior to Camavinga needlessly giving the ball away.īut what of the image that was shared to prove the ball was out? It was intercepted by Rodri and this eventually led to De Bruyne scoring the goal. The France international simply played a poor pass into a central area that failed to reach his teammate. Shortly after the throw-in, De Bruyne lost the ball to Camavinga, who then had controlled possession and the option to pick out on easy pass. when it is "lost" by the opponents (e.g. clearly controls and moves with or passes the ballįor the purposes of defining the start of the next APP, the attacking team (Man City) can gain possession of the ball: "clears" the ball without being under any pressure the defending team gain "controlled possession" of the ball i.e. "They did not go far enough back to check if the ball was out or not."ĭid not go far enough back, or shouldn't go further back? There are key parts to the VAR protocol. In a situation like that they have to intervene," Wenger said on beINSPORTS. "The VAR normally should check if the goal is regular or not. Anything before that pass isn't valid for a review.Ĭomments from Arsene Wenger, FIFA's head of global football, were widely reported. ESPN sources have confirmed that goal was allowed to stand because the attacking phase of play (APP) was reset when Eduardo Camavinga gave the ball away with a poor pass under no pressure after the ball may have gone out of play. VAR review: A graphic shared widely on social media, and referenced by Ancelotti, has taken much of the attention - but all is not what it seems. What happened: Manchester City equalised in the 67th minute when Kevin De Bruyne brilliantly fired into the net from the edge of the area, but Real Madrid coach Carlo Ancelotti and several players were adamant that Bernardo Silva had failed to keep the ball in play just before, and that the goal should have been disallowed by the VAR. VAR in the Premier League: Ultimate guide Possible ball out of play on De Bruyne goal How VAR decisions affected every Premier League club in 2022-23 Manchester City rescued a 1-1 draw at Real Madrid in the first leg of the Champions League semifinals on Tuesday, but there was VAR controversy over the equalising goal. The VAR Review: Why Kevin De Bruyne's goal for Man City vs. You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |